Are we not using it as we haven't come across the case where we need it yet? If that's the case then I'll remove my +1 but from the note it looked as if we just weren't ever using it.
david > @@ -62,7 +62,13 @@ > - It ignores the "type" parameter, so toss it. > - The fname param is allowed to be NULL on the Unix platform. > Change it to always use the passed value, and check callers. > + rbb says: The type parameter is supposed to be used to determine > + if we are working with a read/write lock or a mutex. > + The fname parameter is essentially required if you > + want to be portable, but I dislike wasting cycles to > + outsmart the programmer. > Status: david +1 > + rbb -1
