On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > The question is which of these are worth exporting publicly. I don't have > > a fast or simple answer. So I'm just tossing the list at the list. > > At least all of the HAVE_foo_H ones, I'd think. If there's a reasonable > chance an APR client will need to do the same autoconf test, we might as > well save them the trouble. Header tests pretty easily fall into that > category.
I disagree, but only a little. :-) Some of those header checks are for information that APR completely replaces. We check for the headers, so that we can use the headers, but we don't expect APR applications to use them at all. I do believe that any header Apache or Subversion is currently using is a good place to start however. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
