On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At least all of the HAVE_foo_H ones, I'd think. If there's a reasonable > > chance an APR client will need to do the same autoconf test, we might as > > well save them the trouble. Header tests pretty easily fall into that > > category. > > I disagree, but only a little. :-) Some of those header checks are for > information that APR completely replaces. We check for the headers, so > that we can use the headers, but we don't expect APR applications to use > them at all. I do believe that any header Apache or Subversion is > currently using is a good place to start however.
Fair enough. So let me tone down what I said to simply, "If an APR client might reasonbly need the same test, we should export our test result." +1 for using Apache and Subversion as good places to look for an initial definition of what's "reasonable." --Cliff
