(Assuming OtherBill's message was supposed to go to the list, not just to me...)
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > At least all of the HAVE_foo_H ones, I'd think. If there's a reasonable > > chance an APR client will need to do the same autoconf test, we might as > > well save them the trouble. Header tests pretty easily fall into that > > category. > > I've fat fingered enough code today and have some things I'm trying to polish > up ... anyone who wants to take a crack at it is welcome (starting at apr.h > and working up, this time ... I had to work down to solve the hosed build, > which now seems reasonably more stable.) I can do this tomorrow if nobody beats me to it. Right now I'm trying to figure out a respectably clean way to implement bucket reuse lists to cut down on mallocs/frees. --Cliff
