Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 15 October 2001 10:38 am, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> I seriously doubt that we want to extend the apr_proc_t type anymore. Having
> this type be complete has caused Windows to have to jump through hoops to
> keep track of processes correctly, and adding more to it is a
> mistake IMO.
(rest of Ryan's comments omitted)
I'll reimplement according to your suggestions and post again.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
