Greg Stein wrote: > > I think it would simplify our life, and give us proper dependencies, yet not > cause any undue burden (libtool 1.4 has been out for a long while now...) > > >From IRC, I already have a +1 from Justin and Sander. So I'd say we have > enough positive traction for the move. But does anybody see any *problems* > or have a reason to *not* require 1.4 ? >
I'm a ++1 on requiring 1.4.x as a minumum. From all accounts, the libtool to be shipped with OSX 10.2 will *still* be 1.3-based, but the various 1.4.2 Darwin builds (like Pier's) work just fine. Also, IIRC, doesn't PHP since like 4.1.x require 1.4.2 ? -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
