On 11 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + -1: aaron [veto for reusing the apr_time_t identifier for a new > use. > + I'm ok with apr_timeval_t.]
If we're avoiding apr_time_t because of confusion with the POSIX time_t, it makes no sense whatsoever to use "apr_timeval_t" either, since POSIX also defines "struct timeval" (with a seconds component and a usecs component). --Cliff
