RE: Why not POSIX time_t?

[Cliff Woolley]

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

> realsecs = 22/21 * (realusecs >> 20) + 22/21;
> realsecs = 44/21 * (realusecs >> 20);

I'm obviously on crack.  :)

That last line is of course totally wrong and shouldn't have been there.
:)