Bill Stoddard wrote:
Cliff demonstrates that there is significant loss of accuracy using just a shift. I believe (faith? :-) that there is a simple solution to this. Don't know what it is just now though...
I think the simple solution is to pack the data into the apr_time_t using (seconds << 20) + microseconds instead of (seconds * 1000000) + microseconds
-1 [that's a veto, not a vote.]
This is the same as a struct timeval, but harder to manipulate!
