On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brian Pane wrote: > seconds = (t >> 20) + (t >> 24) > > That probably isn't accurate enough, but you get the basic idea: > sum a couple of t/(2^n) terms to approximate t/1000000. > > What do you think?
Sounds like the right idea. But I'm still not sure this isn't too complicated. ;-]
