Aaron Bannert wrote: > > I move that we implement a runtime version checking scheme in APR and > then release 1.0 as soon as possible, at the same time adopting the > above versioning definitions. >
Assuming that we all sign up to the statement that APR is 1.0 ready, or soon will be, I'm +1 on this. I don't want to hear people whining about how "APR was rushed to released" the way we still hear such comments regarding Apache2. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
