Jim Jagielski wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
I move that we implement a runtime version checking scheme in APR and then release 1.0 as soon as possible, at the same time adopting the above versioning definitions.
Assuming that we all sign up to the statement that APR is 1.0 ready, or soon will be, I'm +1 on this.
I think APR is close to being ready for 1.0. We still need to fix the apr_time_t performance problems (the old 64-bit division issue), though.
Brian
