Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've >>> discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by >>> apr-0.9.15. >> >> How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the >> backports (which seems to make sense to me given the comments >> in r473681, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=473681)? >> Or should we backport r447894? >> I am happy to proceed either way with a preference of reverting. > > That would be my pref as well...
+1. I raised an objection when this first went in that changing the "contract" was iffy. Our entire versioning rules were based on the fact that once you have a specific major, minimum .minor - that's it. Your app is safe. It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert. Bill
