On 08/15/2007 07:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>>> It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert. >>> Done in r565517. >> Wasn't the (*new)->remote_addr_unknown = 0; causing the problem? > > Are you thinking of the unix issue or windows issue? > > The windows issue is that we defined that remote address was flagged known > before - and became known, because httpd filled it in on AcceptEx from > the data. Windows 2000 could *only* recall the remote IP from the AcceptEx > command, and the classic socket commands returned 0.0.0.0. This had been > already fixed in the last apr release, and filling in the remote IP from > httpd now causes the 'unknown' to be toggled false. > > Rüdiger observed (with respect to a platform he didn't identify);
I posted the platform to [EMAIL PROTECTED] later. So just for the records: SuSE Linux 32 Bit: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Linux euler 2.6.18.8-0.5-ruediger-20070715 #1 PREEMPT Sun Jul 15 10:44:38 CEST 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux glibc-2.5-25 openSUSE 10.2 (i586) VERSION = 10.2 Regards Rüdiger
