On 08/13/2007 09:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> On 08/13/2007 07:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>>> Jim's spearheaded an effort to release httpd-2.0.60 and we've >>>> discovered a set of socket issues that need to be corrected by >>>> apr-0.9.15. >>> How do we plan to address these? Like in 1.2.x by reverting the >>> backports (which seems to make sense to me given the comments >>> in r473681, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=473681)? >>> Or should we backport r447894? >>> I am happy to proceed either way with a preference of reverting. >> That would be my pref as well... > > +1. I raised an objection when this first went in that changing the > "contract" was iffy. Our entire versioning rules were based on the > fact that once you have a specific major, minimum .minor - that's it. > Your app is safe. > > It's a nice idea in 1.3, but since it's causing issues, simply revert.
Done in r565517. Regards Rüdiger
