Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Of course not, that's why I posted.The clear consensus here in the room is that the current approach to LDAP is broken and ill thought-out (for the reasons I illuminated), but what there isn't consensus on is how to proceed. Hence, the discussion on-list about how to proceed. -- justin
Votes follow the discussion, they don't precede it.What is clear is that there is a wide lack of understanding of how the IETF draft LDAP C API works, and before people can suggest possible solutions, first everyone needs to fully understand the problem they are trying to solve.
Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
