On 05 Oct 2010, at 9:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to "trunk"? It is the trunk for that tree now.
+1, makes sense - it clears up the confusion over where "apr-util- trunk" has gone.
Regards, Graham --
On 05 Oct 2010, at 9:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to "trunk"? It is the trunk for that tree now.
+1, makes sense - it clears up the confusion over where "apr-util- trunk" has gone.
Regards, Graham --