On 06 Oct 2010, at 6:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
I don't really need the status quo "explained" to me in a README file.
I proposed to fix it, because it is (to me, obviously) broken.
1) The tip of development for the apr-util tree is what is currently
branches/1.5.x. Yes, most of that code also exists in the apr tree.
apr-util releases and branches do not come from the apr tree, they
come
from the apr-util tree.
2) I have hard-coded into my brain the convention that the trunk is
the
trunk, not a branch named by its current version. I also have scripts
which make this assumption.
3) The trunk called branches/1.5.x will have to be renamed to a trunk
called branches/1.6.x if 1.5.x gets cut. Which is dumb.
4) Yes, "people" might get confused if they try to use apr-util's
trunk
with the APR 2.x, but, meh. We are the people who use the VCS and it
should be arranged for our convenience.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
