2010/10/5 Nick Kew <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:33:04 -0500 > "William A. Rowe Jr." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote: >> > Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to "trunk"? It is >> > the trunk for that tree now. >> >> -.5, because for the confusion it saves the dozen of us, many more dozens >> will be confused by checking out apr and apr-util trunks as they have in >> the past, only to be confronted by a checkout that doesn't work. > > Good point, well made. We're software developers, not coppicers. > How many trunks do we need? > > But it does perhaps highlight a need to be clearer about where we are. > Might another idea be to have an apr-util/trunk/ containing nothing > but a README explaining the situation? >
+1. Cheers, Henry
