Should a link to the development release be so obvious to end users here with no disclaimers?
When we go alpha or beta then maybe we can include here but until that time I don't think users should be pushed to a non-stable release. Bob. 2008/5/13 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Tom, > > I agree and was also worried about the ownership of > http://www.argouml-users.net/, you can see my question in the forum there. > > But: > > > > 1. Making sure that the project retains control of intellectual > > property like host names, web site contents, etc. If the wiki > > successfully attracts lots of user contribution, it will be a very > > valuable resource that would be a shame to lose. > > I feel not confortable with mentioning this here. It might look like the > content of http://www.argouml-users.net/ belongs to the project, but I > consider it more as a users site. > > Personally, I'll support it, as long as the project has no better solution, > and I won't wait for that. > > > Thomas > -- > GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! > Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
