Hi! -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:51:28 +0200 > Von: "Thomas N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] experimental sharing of information
> > =(:o)) I could add the wiki tab to the help action, so we would be back > on > > your topic! ;-) > > +1 for that, don't forget to mention both the Wiki and the forum! See the file, I've sent to you... > I thought about what would be the best way to establish a technical > platform for user communication like wiki&forum. Is it best to wait for some > decision here? Or should the users decide if they want this? I guess the only way to let them decide, is to offer them this communication channel and see, if they use it. I could even imagine some IRC chat within argo. > In the end I just posted inofficially to the users mailing list about > http://www.argouml-users.net/, but eventually there must be a visible > commitment of the project to the communication channels, > preferable on the user documentation page > http://argouml.tigris.org/documentation/ I've a question on this page. The manual version there is 0.24. It's also currently hardcoded in my little help action: http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/manual-0.24/ Do you think it makes sense of offer a link, like http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/manual-current/ , where you would always read the latest version? Or could it be, that a user has such an old argo version, that it lacks some features described in the latest manual, and the new manual might confuse him? (But we could always have the current Argo version in the manual.) Ciao, Andreas -- 249 Spiele für nur 1 Preis. Die GMX Spieleflatrate schon ab 9,90 Euro. Neu: Asterix bei den Olympischen Spielen: http://flat.games.gmx.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
