Check the XMI document in the first link I sent you, I think its there.

        <Model:Tag xmi.id='a2' name='org.omg.xmi.namespace=UML'
annotation='' tagId='org.omg.xmi.namespace' elements='a0'>

I'm no expert on the XMI myself. We tend to mainly just deal with the
class library that is generated from it using MDR.

Tony - I doubt this is anything we can modify. The specifications are
supplied by the OMG standards body and the XML generated by ArgoUML
for its project files is actually produced by the MDR classes not our
own.

Regards

Bob



On 4 July 2010 15:17, Rolf Schumacher <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for your kind answer Bob.
>
> However, I was not able to locate the string "org.omg.xmi.namespace.UML"
> in any of these two documents.
>
> May be you got me wrong: I'm not looking for specifications about the
> concept or use of namespaces in UML or the like. I'm looking for a
> somewhat official document that maps e.g. the string
> "org.omg.xmi.namespace.UML" to the 05-04-01.pdf document specifying UML
> 1.4.2 in order to direct you - the agrouml implementers - to use that
> string as a namespace while exporting a UML model to a XMI representation.
>
> It would even be better if I could find a document with all namespace
> strings for any UML specification known so far. Does someone know how
> those mappings get defined globally?
>
> Or am I wrong in my expectations to find the xmlns:UML-strings used by
> tool vendors for XMI exports in some tool-independent specifiction document?
>
> kind regards
>
> Rolf
>
> On 04.07.2010 14:10, Bob Tarling wrote:
>> Yes, we are following different OMG specifications. At the moment
>> ArgoUML is using UML 1.4(.2)
>>
>> For ArgoUML these links will be useful for you
>>
>> The XMI and DTD are here - http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/1.4/ (it looks
>> like it is the XMI document that specifies the namespace)
>>
>> These are for UML 1.4 however we follow the specification for UML
>> 1.4.2 which is here - http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05-04-01
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> On 4 July 2010 11:07, Rolf Schumacher<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, argouml professionals
>>>
>>> looking around for to comprehend differences in xmi export of several
>>> tools I could not identify the very source of UML namespace definitions.
>>>
>>> Obviously argouml uses
>>>
>>> xmlns:UML = 'org.omg.xmi.namespace.UML'
>>>
>>> while Rational uses
>>>
>>> xmlns:UML="http://www.omg.org/UML";
>>>
>>> I am wondering whether the difference is due to using different UML
>>> specifications as the basis for the model definition and exports.
>>> However, I could not find the OMG document where the namespaces are
>>> mapped to specification editions of UML.
>>>
>>> Could someone here help me to find the right document (or the right
>>> question to my problem)?
>>>
>>> Rolf
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2629213
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
>>> [[email protected]].
>>> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, 
>>> email: [[email protected]]
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2629224
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
>> [[email protected]].
>> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
>> [[email protected]]
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2629244
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
> [[email protected]].
> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
> [[email protected]]
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2629249

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to