On 24 March 2011 15:39, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote: > (...) > We have that catch-22 though. We are only a small team and what I > suggest will take time and slow further our crawl to UML2. If we can't > do that then nobody will take us seriously for anything else. > > There are other things we could do but I think anyone who is willing > to work on ArgoUML should be encouraged to help the push to UML2.
Hi Bob, I think you are totally right on this. UML2 transition is the way to go. Just notice that if we get there and more or less at that time OMG publishes the all new and shiny UML3 which breaks backwards compatibility with UML2 I'm going to consider that stopping from following OMG's new UML standards is going to be the most reasonable way to move forward. Luís > > Bob > ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2714026 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
