Oh, I might have misunderstood then. But looks like we reached at the same conclusion at the end, so I guess we're good :)
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Tal Liron <t...@gigaspaces.com> wrote: > > About storing in policy information in nodes/templates that the policy is > > associated with in general - sounds interesting, I'm not sure I'd > implement > > this right away, I think it'd be better to hold off and see what sort of > > policies might exist in the future and what data might be useful to keep > on > > the node/template first. > > > > Oh sorry, I was trying to make the opposite point. :) I don't think there > is a good reason to store special policy information in nodes, when it can > easily be looked up. And so in this case I am considering the aria.Scaling > Policy to be just another policy, which is why I am saying we shouldn't > store "default_instances" in the node... >
