Thanks, Alasdair. I thought there will be a respin due to the copyright year problem Tim mentioned:o.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > Err, well I think the vote on 0.3 passed so I guess no, but thanks for the > fix so it'll be right next time. > > Alasdair Nottingham > > On 3 Feb 2011, at 21:36, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just noticed there are three files in blog itests with the incomplete > > license. The license reads: > > > > /* > > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > * distributed with this work for additional information > > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > * > > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > * > > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > * specific language governing permissions and limitations > > * under the License. > > */ > > > > As you can see the first line 'Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation > > (ASF) under one' was missing:(. > > > > Do we need to fix this before we start a vote for 0.3 release? > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Emily > > ================= > > Emily Jiang > > [email protected] > -- Thanks Emily ================= Emily Jiang [email protected]
