On 4 February 2011 14:01, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > Further to your suggestion, I took this up with RAT dev and was told that > RAT at the moment only validates either license text or license URL for some > reason. If either of them is valid, it will pass validation. That explains > why you did not get a validation error. I have raised a jira RAT-82 for them > to tighten up the validation.
Thanks. I'll got and vote for it :-) > > Thanks > Emily > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3 February 2011 21:36, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Just noticed there are three files in blog itests with the incomplete >> > license. The license reads: >> > >> > /* >> > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file >> > * distributed with this work for additional information >> > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file >> > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the >> > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance >> > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at >> > * >> > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> > * >> > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, >> > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an >> > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY >> > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the >> > * specific language governing permissions and limitations >> > * under the License. >> > */ >> > >> > As you can see the first line 'Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation >> > (ASF) under one' was missing:(. >> >> What's worrying is that RAT doesn't pick this up. I just tried a mvn >> -Prat in the blog-itests dir and it didn't complain. We're using RAT >> 0.6 and not the latest which is 0.7..... >> >> Just tried 0.7 and that didn't complain either. Would you be able to >> discuss on the rat list or open a JIRA. They're at >> http://incubator.apache.org/rat >> >> Thanks. >> >> > >> > Do we need to fix this before we start a vote for 0.3 release? >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks >> > Emily >> > ================= >> > Emily Jiang >> > [email protected] >> > >> > > > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > [email protected] >
