On 3 February 2011 21:36, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > Just noticed there are three files in blog itests with the incomplete > license. The license reads: > > /* > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > * distributed with this work for additional information > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > * > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > * > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > * specific language governing permissions and limitations > * under the License. > */ > > As you can see the first line 'Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation > (ASF) under one' was missing:(.
What's worrying is that RAT doesn't pick this up. I just tried a mvn -Prat in the blog-itests dir and it didn't complain. We're using RAT 0.6 and not the latest which is 0.7..... Just tried 0.7 and that didn't complain either. Would you be able to discuss on the rat list or open a JIRA. They're at http://incubator.apache.org/rat Thanks. > > Do we need to fix this before we start a vote for 0.3 release? > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > [email protected] >
