Le 05/10/2019 à 01:40, Micah Kornfield a écrit : >> >>> It was my impression that we had workable solutions for using Result in >> at >>> least Python and Glib/Ruby (I'm don't know about R). >> >> In Python we do (though it needed a C++-side helper). >> > OK, so what could more context be provided on: > >> From the discussion in the sync call, it seems reasonable to require that: >> Public APIs which are likely to be directly wrapped in a binding should not >> use Result<> to the exclusion of Status. An equivalent Status API should >> always be provided for ease of binding.
I don't know, sorry :-) I wasn't on the sync call. Regards Antoine.
