+1 (I think this makes 4 binding +1s, if I count correctly)
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 11:30 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > +1 (binding), with the caveat that I looked mostly at the C API. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 21/09/2022 à 17:40, David Li a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based database > access and have been working on implementations of the proposed interfaces > [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a unified > client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like Flight SQL) > and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow projects > like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. > > > > For details, see the RFC here: > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 > > > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along > with apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC API > standard. > > > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is not > a vote to release any components.) > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification > > [ ] 0 > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > > > Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and > implementations of the proposal. > > > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc > > [3]: > https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa > > > > Thank you, > > David >
