I've merged https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079. (Note this doesn't add any code artifacts to 10.0.0; it just describes the specification as part of the format documentation.)
-David On Mon, Oct 10, 2022, at 07:39, David Li wrote: > My vote: +1 > > The vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes, 8 non-binding +1 votes, and no > -1 votes. Thanks all! > > I will update the RFC PR and merge it next, and will continue setting > up the CI and release process. > > -David > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 15:38, David Li wrote: >> Kirill (CC'd) mentioned the organization could be improved [1] - I've >> put up a PR to move the definitions around to make it easier for >> implementors [2]. >> >> I'll leave this thread open for a little while longer for any >> interested parties/see if anyone has PR comments before I'll merge the >> PR/vote/close/etc. Thanks all! >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/145 >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/148 >> >> -David >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 15:27, Neal Richardson wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> (I think this makes 4 binding +1s, if I count correctly) >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 11:30 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> +1 (binding), with the caveat that I looked mostly at the C API. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Antoine. >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 21/09/2022 à 17:40, David Li a écrit : >>>> > Hello, >>>> > >>>> > We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based database >>>> access and have been working on implementations of the proposed interfaces >>>> [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a unified >>>> client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like Flight SQL) >>>> and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow projects >>>> like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. >>>> > >>>> > For details, see the RFC here: >>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 >>>> > >>>> > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along >>>> with apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC API >>>> standard. >>>> > >>>> > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is not >>>> a vote to release any components.) >>>> > >>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification >>>> > [ ] 0 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... >>>> > >>>> > Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and >>>> implementations of the proposal. >>>> > >>>> > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 >>>> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc >>>> > [3]: >>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa >>>> > >>>> > Thank you, >>>> > David >>>>
