> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 336 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line336>
> >
> >     Like model builds, recommend adding an attribute for number of GPU's.

done


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 339 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line339>
> >
> >     Would this be things like pod ID's? If we want to expose this kind of 
> > low-level, debugging information then let's make it complete enough to 
> > support most debugging use cases. 
> >     
> >     For example, in order to take action based on the pod ID's, a cluster 
> > admin would need to know the k8s API server API, the kubeconfig, and the 
> > namespace in which the model is running.
> >     
> >     I think we could leave this field out for now, add an unstructured 
> > 'metadata' field and tackle the debugging flows later.

I removed it


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 346 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line346>
> >
> >     Should we add number of replicas?

done


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 361 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line361>
> >
> >     Should this be optional?

it is removed


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 373 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line373>
> >
> >     Is this for things like admin/full user/viewer only? If so, why make it 
> > non-optional?

changed it to optional. I am thinking the type is admin/user, mlgov/service etc.


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 384-385 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line384>
> >
> >     There currently is no such process in CML, projects are always created 
> > by user clicks in the UI.
> >     
> >     Oh, is this just here to define lineage relationships betwene users and 
> > projects?

yes. The user is associated with a process, and the process creates a project. 
A user can have a lot of metadata. We don't want to duplicate the info to a 
project.


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 415 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line415>
> >
> >     Same question about whether uniqueId should really be optional.

removed.


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 442 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line442>
> >
> >     The name above is just ml_project_create_process.

This is relationship between ml_user and ml_project_create_process


> On Oct. 16, 2019, 4:28 p.m., Anand Patil wrote:
> > addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json
> > Lines 480 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/?file=2169131#file2169131line480>
> >
> >     What's the reason for the ml_user prefix here and on 
> > ml_user_model_deploy_process?

it is a relationship involves two types


- Na


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/#review218231
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 16, 2019, 12:30 a.m., Na Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 16, 2019, 12:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Austin Nobis, Ashutosh Mestry, Karthik Manamcheri, 
> Sridhar K, Madhan Neethiraj, and Sarath Subramanian.
> 
> 
> Bugs: atlas-3464
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/atlas-3464
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Define entities used for Machine Learning Governance
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   addons/models/1000-Hadoop/1111-ml_model.json PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71619/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> verified it is valid json file
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Na Li
> 
>

Reply via email to