-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72440/#review220666
-----------------------------------------------------------




repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/discovery/SearchProcessor.java
Lines 995 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72440/#comment309232>

    entityType could be null when called from FreeTextSearchProcessor. Please 
review and update to handle this condition.


- Madhan Neethiraj


On April 29, 2020, 10:26 a.m., Damian Warszawski wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72440/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 29, 2020, 10:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Ashutosh Mestry, Bolke de Bruin, Madhan Neethiraj, 
> and Sarath Subramanian.
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> No way to sort results by specified attribute while freetext search is 
> enabled. In our case we would like to enforce ordering by introducing custom 
> attribute definition e.g. popularity score from 
> https://github.com/dwarszawski/amundsen-atlas-types/blob/master/amundsenatlastypes/schema/01_2_table_schema.json
> 
> 
> Reference to jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3758
> Patched applied against master branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/discovery/EntitySearchProcessor.java
>  1a7bf6b16 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/discovery/FreeTextSearchProcessor.java
>  92b5eb4d2 
>   repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/discovery/SearchProcessor.java 
> 11eb7ca49 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72440/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Patch was applied on our dev env with custom entity definitions and 
> successfully verified if order is applied as specified in the search query.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Damian Warszawski
> 
>

Reply via email to