> On July 23, 2020, 4:52 a.m., Ashutosh Mestry wrote:
> > repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/patches/ConcurrentPatchProcessor.java
> > Lines 44 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72695/diff/1/?file=2236038#file2236038line44>
> >
> >     I suggest use AtlasConfiguration for this. Also, I think this should be 
> > true by default.
> 
> Damian Warszawski wrote:
>     Great simplification. Thanks Ashutosh.

Not sure if that should be true by default as long as not having a proper 
benchmarks how the performance is degradated.


- Damian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72695/#review221323
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 24, 2020, 8:23 a.m., Damian Warszawski wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72695/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 24, 2020, 8:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Ashutosh Mestry, Bolke de Bruin, madhan, and Sarath 
> Subramanian.
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Optional configuration to support locks on JanusGraph to ensure data 
> consitency.
> 
> JanusGraph is eventually consistent by default which is efficient but results 
> in duplicates when race condition occurs.
> 
> 
> Reference to jira 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ATLAS/issues/ATLAS-3398
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> graphdb/janus/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/graphdb/janus/AtlasJanusGraphManagement.java
>  6ef9cb76c 
>   intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/AtlasConfiguration.java 2c007ca01 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72695/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Not possible to reproduce the error on local machine. Enable locking on our 
> dev env and have not introduce any regression.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Damian Warszawski
> 
>

Reply via email to