That was my mistake, sorry for that. I should have tagged [1] as a blocker
because leaking state is probably a bad idea. At least then people would be
aware and we could have discussed whether it is a blocker.

There is already an open PR for this now.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1517

On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 18:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:

> Regarding BEAM-649, it's not a release blocker, it's a good to have.
>
> As I'm pretty close to the end of the Pull Request (hopefully tonight or
> tomorrow), it's a "Good To Have".
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/28/2017 06:09 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> > Can we please use JIRA to tag potentially release-blocking issues? Anyone
> > can just add a 'Fix Versions' field of an open issue to the next
> scheduled
> > release -- and it becomes easily visible to everyone in the project.
> >
> > In general, I'm not a fan of blocking releases for new functionality.
> > Rushing new features and a lack of baking time usually translates to
> bugs.
> > However, I think this time it is totally justified -- on a separate
> thread
> > we plan for this to be the last release before the "first stable
> release";
> > and picking the new features now will provide additional coverage for it.
> >
> > So, +1, but please tag in JIRA.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to finish these two:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1036: Support for new State
> API
> >> in FlinkRunner
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1116: Support for new Timer
> API
> >> in Flink runner
> >>
> >> Both of them are finished for the streaming runner, for the batch runner
> >> I'm merging the code for the first right now and the second will not
> take
> >> long.
> >>
> >> There is also this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1517:
> User
> >> state in the Flink Streaming Runner is not garbage collected. It's not a
> >> regression from 0.5.0 where we simply didn't have this feature but I'm
> >> still somewhat uneasy about this.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 09:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fair enough.
> >>>
> >>> I also try to merge https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1739 asap.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>> On 02/28/2017 09:34 AM, Amit Sela wrote:
> >>>> I'd prefer we wait to merge https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2050
> >>>> Shouldn't take long now..
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sounds good!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ahmet, notice ASF has not current infrastructure to stage Python
> >> Release
> >>>>> Candidates. Anyway we left unmanaged the Maven deploy lifecycle for
> >> the
> >>>>> Python SDK, but it should be discussed at some point.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Ahmet Altay
> >> <al...@google.com.invalid
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's been about a month since the last release. I would like propose
> >>>>>> starting the next release. There are no releasing blocking bugs in
> >> JIRA
> >>>>>> [1]. Are there any release blocking issues I am missing?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unless there is an objection I will volunteer to manage this
> release.
> >>>>> This
> >>>>>> will be the first release with Python content. In case there are
> >> issues
> >>>>>> with that it might be easier for me to resolve and document those as
> >>> part
> >>>>>> of the release process.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>> Ahmet
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>> 3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%
> >>>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%200.6.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%
> >>>>>> 20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Sergio Fernández
> >>>>> Partner Technology Manager
> >>>>> Redlink GmbH
> >>>>> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925> <+43%20660%202747925>
> <+43%20660%202747925>
> >>>>> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> >>>>> w: http://redlink.co
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>> jbono...@apache.org
> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to