Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and > configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN. > > There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do with > my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts > try these on their more realistic setups. > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios > > (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and > > still going strong in streaming) > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin > <dhalp...@google.com.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm focusing on: > > > > > > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb) > > > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.) > > > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster < > > > > jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here. > > > > > > > > > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > > aljos...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this document! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded > the > > > > > > acceptance > > > > > > > > criteria document [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by: > > > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or > > > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or > > > > > > > > * validating a criteria. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep > or > > > too > > > > > > broad > > > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had > > > > earlier. > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple, > > surface-level > > > > > > things. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please: > > > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and > > > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that > > > specific > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > candidate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Davor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d > > > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg > > > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ------- > > > > > Jason Kuster > > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- ------- Jason Kuster Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
