Enjoy Kenn !
Regards
JB
On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me on
it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might not
see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
the release.
See you Monday!
Kenn
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
on Spark, doh
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <jasonkus...@google.com>
wrote:
Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster successfully.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.invalid
wrote:
I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do
with
my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
experts
try these on their more realistic setups.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
(primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
and
still going strong in streaming)
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
<dhalp...@google.com.invalid
wrote:
I'm focusing on:
* user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
* the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
<lc...@google.com.invalid
wrote:
I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
da...@apache.org>
wrote:
Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
here.
We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
aljos...@apache.org>
wrote:
Thanks for starting this document!
I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
Best,
Aljoscha
On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
wrote:
Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
the
acceptance
criteria document [2].
Please consider contributing to this effort by:
* proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
* supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
* validating a criteria.
Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
deep or
too
broad
-- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
had
earlier.
This
should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
surface-level
things.
If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
please:
* file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
and
* post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
specific
release
candidate.
Thanks!
Davor
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/
1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
