Validated same examples Vikas mentioned for Windows. Updated the doc on
acceptance criteria.

Thanks,
Cham

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM Vikas RK <vikky...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just validated wordcount and mobile gaming examples for Python SDK on
> Direct and Dataflow runner. Mostly looks good to me, with minor changes
> that could be done to improve user experience, but not a blocker for FSR.
> (filed BEAM-2286 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2286>)
>
> On 12 May 2017 at 07:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> > Enjoy Kenn !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/2017 03:38 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> >
> >> I wanted to let this thread & list know that I'll be offline camping
> >> starting ~now through the weekend. So if you see any open thread with me
> >> on
> >> it, please do take it over. Things are looking pretty good, so I might
> not
> >> see any more action. I have a lot of faith in this community to validate
> >> the release.
> >>
> >> See you Monday!
> >>
> >> Kenn
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <
> >> jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> on Spark, doh
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jason Kuster <jasonkus...@google.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just validated a decently-sized wordcount on a YARN cluster
> successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Kenneth Knowles
> <k...@google.com.invalid
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
> >>>>> configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to
> do
> >>>>> with
> >>>>> my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system
> >>>>>
> >>>> experts
> >>>
> >>>> try these on their more realistic setups.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh
> <tg...@google.com.invalid
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of
> scenarios
> >>>>>> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> and
> >>>
> >>>> still going strong in streaming)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <dhalp...@google.com.invalid
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm focusing on:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> >>>>>>> * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies,
> etc.)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> <lc...@google.com.invalid
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> >>>>>>>> jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> da...@apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this document!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> acceptance
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> criteria document [2].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * validating a criteria.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> deep or
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> broad
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> had
> >>>
> >>>> earlier.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> surface-level
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> things.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you discover issues while validating a criteria,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> please:
> >>>
> >>>> * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Davor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -------
> >>>> Jason Kuster
> >>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -------
> >>> Jason Kuster
> >>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>

Reply via email to