Thank you. Updated the JIRA with that information. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
> Is seem to have pip 9.0.1: > > ~ $ pip --version > pip 9.0.1 from /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages (python 2.7) > > > On 20. Jul 2017, at 18:07, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > Aljoscha, your issues sounds like > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2587. It is possible that you > > have an old pip version installed. Could you check that? > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Agree: I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2647 about > >> that. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> > >> On 07/20/2017 02:32 PM, Aviem Zur wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks Kenn for the info, > >>> +1 that this should be included in a release verification guide. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Aljoscha > >>>> > >>>> Do you have all python requirements installed on your machine ? > >>>> > >>>> Especially, pip, setuptools, tox, ... ? > >>>> > >>>> It sounds like a missing Python requirement on your machine to me. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> On 07/20/2017 10:36 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> + 0.8 > >>>>> > >>>>> I tried running "mvn package” on my machine build it fails. This is > the > >>>>> > >>>> log output: > >>>> https://gist.github.com/aljoscha/dc194303bede8bc635e2d8b691bb58f8 < > >>>> https://gist.github.com/aljoscha/dc194303bede8bc635e2d8b691bb58f8>. > It > >>>> fails when trying to build the Python part. Unfortunately I know > almost > >>>> nothing about this but one thing that caught my attention was this > >>>> snipped > >>>> "RuntimeError: Not in apache git tree; unable to find proto > >>>> definitions.”. > >>>> Could this be a problem? > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Otherwise I’d say the RC is good and I did this: > >>>>> > >>>>> - verified the checksums and signature > >>>>> - checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are present > >>>>> - used the staged artefacts to create a Quickstart project > >>>>> - checked that the compiled Quickstart works with a Flink 1.2.1 > >>>>> > >>>> cluster in batch and streaming mode > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 19. Jul 2017, at 19:48, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.INVALID> > >>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 to the RC > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Relating to Aviem's question, I think we need a release verification > >>>>>> > >>>>> guide, > >>>> > >>>>> at the least as a section of the Release Guide. But if we follow > >>>>>> > >>>>> through on > >>>> > >>>>> the prior thread of having a validation matrix with manual steps > people > >>>>>> sign up for, that is even better, and saves repeated work. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As notes towards this, below this email I have included the steps > to go > >>>>>> through the Java quickstart with the RC on DirectRunner and > >>>>>> > >>>>> DataflowRunner, > >>>> > >>>>> which I have done. It should be also easy for other runners. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think the full ValidatesRunner suite run against the release-2.1.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>> branch > >>>> > >>>>> is adequate rather than trying to run them all against the RC, since > we > >>>>>> > >>>>> are > >>>> > >>>>> not trying (necessarily) to testing the release plugin. I wouldn't > >>>>>> > >>>>> _oppose_ > >>>> > >>>>> an easy way to run the full suite... (maybe just a fancy command > line?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kenn > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <settings> > >>>>>> <activeProfiles> > >>>>>> <activeProfile>beam-2.1.0</activeProfile> > >>>>>> </activeProfiles> > >>>>>> <profiles> > >>>>>> <profile> > >>>>>> <id>beam-2.1.0</id> > >>>>>> <repositories> > >>>>>> <repository> > >>>>>> <id>beam-2.1.0</id> > >>>>>> <url> > >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1019/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> </url> > >>>> > >>>>> </repository> > >>>>>> <repository> > >>>>>> <id>archetype</id> > >>>>>> <url> > >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1019/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> </url> > >>>> > >>>>> </repository> > >>>>>> </repositories> > >>>>>> </profile> > >>>>>> </profiles> > >>>>>> </settings> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mvn archetype:generate \ > >>>>>> --settings settings.xml \ > >>>>>> -P beam-2.1.0 \ > >>>>>> -D archetypeGroupId=org.apache.beam \ > >>>>>> -D archetypeArtifactId=beam-sdks- > java-maven-archetypes-examples > >>>>>> \ > >>>>>> -D archetypeVersion=2.1.0 \ > >>>>>> -D groupId=org.example \ > >>>>>> -D artifactId=wordcountbeam \ > >>>>>> -D version="0.1" \ > >>>>>> -D package=org.apache.beam.examples \ > >>>>>> -D interactiveMode=false > >>>>>> > >>>>>> cd wordcountbeam > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mvn compile exec:java \ > >>>>>> --settings ../settings.xml \ > >>>>>> -Pdirect-runner \ > >>>>>> -D exec.mainClass=org.apache.beam.examples.WordCount \ > >>>>>> -D exec.args="--inputFile=pom.xml --output=counts" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mvn compile exec:java \ > >>>>>> --settings ../settings.xml \ > >>>>>> -P dataflow-runner \ > >>>>>> -D exec.mainClass=org.apache.beam.examples.WordCount \ > >>>>>> -D exec.args="--runner=DataflowRunner > >>>>>> --project=<your-gcp-project> > >>>>>> --gcpTempLocation=gs://<your-gcs-bucket>/tmp > >>>>>> --inputFile=gs://apache-beam-samples/shakespeare/* > >>>>>> --output=gs://<your-gcs-bucket>/counts" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't understand as all jars are on the Nexus staging repository. > >>>>>>> The zip are also on staging repository. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2017, 18:47, at 18:47, Aviem Zur <aviem...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> @JB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, yes I saw that link, however those appear to be just the > sources, > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>> jars. > >>>>>>>> Do we have built RC jars us to validate which are then deployed > as is > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> dist (renamed to remove -RC and so forth) or do we each compile > these > >>>>>>>> manually and are assured that the sources in the dist are the > actual > >>>>>>>> ones > >>>>>>>> that the final jars will be built from? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM Ahmet Altay > <al...@google.com.invalid > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes, +1 on RC2. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Aviem, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> as mentioned in the first e-mail: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - Distributions are available here: > >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/ > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - Artifacts are on the staging repository: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > >>>> beam-1019/ > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 07/19/2017 12:26 PM, Aviem Zur wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Have the jars for RC2 been uploaded somewhere? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> <j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So, I guess you are voting +1 on RC2, correct (just for the > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> tracking) ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/19/2017 08:00 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you JB. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I validated python wordcount and mobile gaming examples on > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Found > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> one > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2636). This > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> does > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to be a blocking issue for RC2, but if we end up having a RC3 > we > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> consider fixing this issue. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmet > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Mingmin Xu < > mingm...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Kenn. SQL DSL should be ready in the next version > 2.2.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to have an overall row "Add SQL DSL" instead of listing all > the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> detailed > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> tasks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Kenneth Knowles > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since it is all on a feature branch and the release notes > when > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> goes > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> master will include "Add SQL DSL" I did not associate the > little > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> bits > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Mingmin Xu > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mingm...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The tasks of SQL should not be labeled as 2.1.0, I've updated > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0, fail to change the 'closed' ones. Can anyone with the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permission > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> update these tasks > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2171?jql= > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0% > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20AND%20component%20%3D%20dsl-sql? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, indeed, the issue like BEAM-2171 should not have > "Fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.1.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/18/2017 06:52 PM, James wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just noticed that some of the DSL_SQL issues are > included in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g. The first one: BEAM-2171, this is not expected,right? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 12:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for > the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [4], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC2" [5], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release and > publishing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> API > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> reference > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manual [6]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release to > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is > adopted > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> majority > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira > >>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ctId=12319527&version=12340528 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ > >>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> beam-1019/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC2 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > >
