+1
> On 6. Oct 2017, at 18:57, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sounds great. If I recall correctly, it means we could also us assignment /
> review requests to pass pull requests around, instead of "R: foo" comments.
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Tyler Akidau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:54 AM Reuven Lax <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lukasz Cwik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think its a great idea and find that the mergebot works well on the
>>>> website.
>>>> Since gitbox enforces that the precommit checks pass, it would also be
>> a
>>>> good forcing function for the community to maintain reliably passing
>>> tests.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> We use Apache gitbox for the website and it works fine (as soon as
>> you
>>>>> linked your Apache and github with 2FA enabled).
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about moving to gitbox for the codebase itself ?
>>>>>
>>>>> It could speed up the review and merge for the PRs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
