Agree,
However, I will a formal vote for the records. As soon as the vote passes, I
will proceed with the next steps (with INFRA).
Regards
JB
On 10/10/2017 12:31 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
Sounds like wild agreement - JB will you be the one to proceed with the
process?
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
It will enable proper work with PRs in the github interface (like
requesting reviewers, merging and closing inactive PRs, after github and
ASF IDs are linked)
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On Oct 9, 2017 6:52 PM, "Thomas Groh" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1.
I do love myself a forcing function for passing tests.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1
On 6. Oct 2017, at 18:57, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
wrote:
Sounds great. If I recall correctly, it means we could also us
assignment /
review requests to pass pull requests around, instead of "R: foo"
comments.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Tyler Akidau
<[email protected]
wrote:
+1
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:54 AM Reuven Lax
<[email protected]
wrote:
+1
On Oct 6, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lukasz Cwik" <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think its a great idea and find that the mergebot works well
on
the
website.
Since gitbox enforces that the precommit checks pass, it would
also
be
a
good forcing function for the community to maintain reliably
passing
tests.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
[email protected]
wrote:
Hi guys,
We use Apache gitbox for the website and it works fine (as soon
as
you
linked your Apache and github with 2FA enabled).
What do you think about moving to gitbox for the codebase
itself
?
It could speed up the review and merge for the PRs.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
