+1 On Oct 9, 2017 6:52 PM, "Thomas Groh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1. > > I do love myself a forcing function for passing tests. > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > On 6. Oct 2017, at 18:57, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sounds great. If I recall correctly, it means we could also us > > assignment / > > > review requests to pass pull requests around, instead of "R: foo" > > comments. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Tyler Akidau > <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:54 AM Reuven Lax <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> On Oct 6, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lukasz Cwik" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I think its a great idea and find that the mergebot works well on > the > > >>>> website. > > >>>> Since gitbox enforces that the precommit checks pass, it would also > be > > >> a > > >>>> good forcing function for the community to maintain reliably passing > > >>> tests. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected] > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi guys, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We use Apache gitbox for the website and it works fine (as soon as > > >> you > > >>>>> linked your Apache and github with 2FA enabled). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> What do you think about moving to gitbox for the codebase itself ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> It could speed up the review and merge for the PRs. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thoughts ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards > > >>>>> JB > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
