Considering that the holiday is around the corner, it would be nice to release 2.2.0 sooner. Cheers -------- Original message --------From: Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com.INVALID> Date: 11/10/17 12:22 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@beam.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.0, release candidate #3 We found another issue that should probably be fixed in 2.2.0 release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3172
A fix is out for review and will be merged soon. Thanks, Cham On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Unfortunately I think I found a data loss bug - it was there since 2.0.0 > but I think it's serious enough that delaying a fix until the next release > would be irresponsible. > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3169 > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:57 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Our release notes look like nothing more than a query for the closed > > jira issues. Do we have a top-level summary to highlight the big > > ticket items in the release? And in particular somewhere to mention > > that this is likely the last release to support Java 7 that'll get > > widely read? > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > Thanks, > > > > > > This RC is currently failing on a number of validation steps, so we > need > > to > > > cut at least one more RC. Fingers crossed that it will be the last one. > > > > > > Reuven > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Konstantinos Katsiapis < > > > katsia...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > >> Just a remark: Release of Tensorflow Transform > > >> <https://github.com/tensorflow/transform> 0.4.0 depends on release of > > >> Apache Beam 2.2.0 so upvoting for a release (the sooner the better). > > >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Are we waiting for any more validation of this candidate? If people > > are > > >> > still running tests I'll hold off on RC4 (to reduce the chance of an > > >> RC5), > > >> > otherwise I'll cut RC4 once Valentyn's PR is merged. > > >> > > > >> > Reuven > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev < > > >> > valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4109 is out to address both > > >> > findings I > > >> > > reported earlier. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Etienne Chauchot < > > echauc...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Just as a remark, I compared (on my laptop though) queries > > execution > > >> > > times > > >> > > > on my previous run of 2.2.0-RC3 with release 2.1.0 and I did not > > see > > >> > any > > >> > > > performance regression. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Best > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Etienne > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Le 09/11/2017 à 03:13, Valentyn Tymofieiev a écrit : > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> I looked at Python side of Dataflow & Direct runners on Linux. > > There > > >> > are > > >> > > >> two findings: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 1. One of the mobile gaming examples did not pass for Dataflow > > >> runner, > > >> > > >> addressed in: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4102 > > >> > > >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapa > > >> > > >> che%2Fbeam%2Fpull%2F4102&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNF3OS6Oo-MeNET > > >> > > >> CCmOxJj5Gm2uH6g> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> . > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2. Python streaming did not work for Dataflow runner, one PR is > > out > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4106, but follow up PRs > may > > be > > >> > > >> required > > >> > > >> as we continue to investigate. If we had a PostCommit tests > suite > > >> > > running > > >> > > >> against a release branch, this could have been caught earlier. > > Filed > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3163. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Reuven Lax > > <re...@google.com.invalid > > >> > > > >> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the > > version > > >> > > 2.2.0, > > >> > > >>> as follows: > > >> > > >>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > >> > > >>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific > > >> > > comments) > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which > > >> > includes: > > >> > > >>> * JIRA release notes [1], > > >> > > >>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org > > >> > > >>> [2], > > >> > > >>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint B98B7708 [3], > > >> > > >>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central > > Repository > > >> > [4], > > >> > > >>> * source code tag "v2.2.0-RC3" [5], > > >> > > >>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing > the > > >> API > > >> > > >>> reference manual [6]. > > >> > > >>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.5.0 and > > OpenJDK/Oracle > > >> > JDK > > >> > > >>> 1.8.0_144. > > >> > > >>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source > > release to > > >> > the > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org [2]. > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > >> > majority > > >> > > >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> Thanks, > > >> > > >>> Reuven > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p > > >> > > >>> rojectId=12319527&version=12341044 > > >> > > >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/ > > >> > > >>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > > >> > > >>> [4] > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > > >> > > >>> beam-1023/ > > >> > > >>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3 > > >> > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3> > > >> > > >>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337 > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Gus Katsiapis | Software Engineer | katsia...@google.com | > 650-918-7487 <(650)%20918-7487> > > <(650)%20918-7487> > > >> > > >
