We are trying our best. Unfortunately I agree with Eugene - releasing a
known data-loss bug (even if it's only in one "feature") should not be
acceptable. Hopefully we can fix this by Monday though.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Considering that the holiday is around the corner, it would be nice to
> release 2.2.0 sooner.
> Cheers
> -------- Original message --------From: Chamikara Jayalath
> <chamik...@google.com.INVALID> Date: 11/10/17  12:22 PM  (GMT-08:00) To:
> dev@beam.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.0, release candidate
> #3
> We found another issue that should probably be fixed in 2.2.0 release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3172
>
> A fix is out for review and will be merged soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM Eugene Kirpichov
> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I think I found a data loss bug - it was there since 2.0.0
> > but I think it's serious enough that delaying a fix until the next
> release
> > would be irresponsible.
> > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3169
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:57 PM Robert Bradshaw
> <rober...@google.com.invalid
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Our release notes look like nothing more than a query for the closed
> > > jira issues. Do we have a top-level summary to highlight the big
> > > ticket items in the release? And in particular somewhere to mention
> > > that this is likely the last release to support Java 7 that'll get
> > > widely read?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > This RC is currently failing on a number of validation steps, so we
> > need
> > > to
> > > > cut at least one more RC. Fingers crossed that it will be the last
> one.
> > > >
> > > > Reuven
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Konstantinos Katsiapis <
> > > > katsia...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Just a remark: Release of Tensorflow Transform
> > > >> <https://github.com/tensorflow/transform> 0.4.0 depends on release
> of
> > > >> Apache Beam 2.2.0 so upvoting for a release (the sooner the better).
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Are we waiting for any more validation of this candidate? If
> people
> > > are
> > > >> > still running tests I'll hold off on RC4 (to reduce the chance of
> an
> > > >> RC5),
> > > >> > otherwise I'll cut RC4 once Valentyn's PR is merged.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Reuven
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev <
> > > >> > valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4109 is out to address both
> > > >> > findings I
> > > >> > > reported earlier.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Etienne Chauchot <
> > > echauc...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Just as a remark, I compared (on my laptop though) queries
> > > execution
> > > >> > > times
> > > >> > > > on my previous run of 2.2.0-RC3 with release 2.1.0 and I did
> not
> > > see
> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > > performance regression.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Best
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Etienne
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Le 09/11/2017 à 03:13, Valentyn Tymofieiev a écrit :
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> I looked at Python side of Dataflow & Direct runners on
> Linux.
> > > There
> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > >> two findings:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 1. One of the mobile gaming examples did not pass for
> Dataflow
> > > >> runner,
> > > >> > > >> addressed in: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4102
> > > >> > > >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapa
> > > >> > > >> che%2Fbeam%2Fpull%2F4102&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNF3OS6Oo-MeNET
> > > >> > > >> CCmOxJj5Gm2uH6g>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> .
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> 2. Python streaming did not work for Dataflow runner, one PR
> is
> > > out
> > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4106, but follow up PRs
> > may
> > > be
> > > >> > > >> required
> > > >> > > >> as we continue to investigate. If we had a PostCommit tests
> > suite
> > > >> > > running
> > > >> > > >> against a release branch, this could have been caught
> earlier.
> > > Filed
> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3163.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Reuven Lax
> > > <re...@google.com.invalid
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
> > > version
> > > >> > > 2.2.0,
> > > >> > > >>> as follows:
> > > >> > > >>>    [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> > > >>>    [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > > >> > > comments)
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> > > >> > includes:
> > > >> > > >>>    * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >> > > >>>    * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org
> > > >> > > >>> [2],
> > > >> > > >>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint B98B7708 [3],
> > > >> > > >>>    * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > Repository
> > > >> > [4],
> > > >> > > >>>    * source code tag "v2.2.0-RC3" [5],
> > > >> > > >>>    * website pull request listing the release and publishing
> > the
> > > >> API
> > > >> > > >>> reference manual [6].
> > > >> > > >>>    * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.5.0 and
> > > OpenJDK/Oracle
> > > >> > JDK
> > > >> > > >>> 1.8.0_144.
> > > >> > > >>>    * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
> > > release to
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > >>> dist.apache.org [2].
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by
> > > >> > majority
> > > >> > > >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > >>> Reuven
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
> > > >> > > >>> rojectId=12319527&version=12341044
> > > >> > > >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/
> > > >> > > >>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > > >> > > >>> [4]
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > > >> > > >>> beam-1023/
> > > >> > > >>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3
> > > >> > > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC3>
> > > >> > > >>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Gus Katsiapis | Software Engineer | katsia...@google.com |
> > 650-918-7487 <(650)%20918-7487>
> > > <(650)%20918-7487>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to