On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:46 AM Raghu Angadi <rang...@google.com> wrote:<br>><br>> Thanks Kenn.<br>><br>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:<br>>><br>>> The fact that its usage has grown probably indicates that we have a large number of transforms that can easily cause data loss / duplication.<br>><br>> Is this specific to Reshuffle or it is true for any GroupByKey? I see Reshuffle as just a wrapper around GBK.<br><br>The issue is when it's used in such a way that data corruption can occur when the underlying GBK output is not stable.
- What is the future of Reshuffle? Ismaël Mejía
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle? Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle? Eugene Kirpichov
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle? Kenneth Knowles
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle? Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle... Robert Bradshaw
- Re: What is the future of Reshuffle... Robert Bradshaw
- Re: What is the future of Reshu... Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of R... Kenneth Knowles
- Re: What is the future of R... Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of R... Robert Bradshaw
- Re: What is the future of R... Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of R... Robert Bradshaw
- Re: What is the future of R... Raghu Angadi
- Re: What is the future of R... Robert Bradshaw
- Re: What is the future of R... Reuven Lax