On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:07 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:
> It isn't any particular logic in Reshuffle - it is, semantically, an > identity transform. It is the fact that other runners are perfectly able to > re-run transform prior to a GBK. So, for example, randomly generated IDs > will be re-generated. > Ah, thanks, that makes sense. That implies to me Reshuffle is no more broken than GBK itself. May be Reshuffle.viaRandomKey() could have a clear caveat. Reshuffle's JavaDoc could add a caveat too about non-deterministic keys and retries (though it applies to GroupByKey in general). We tend to put in reshuffles in order to "commit" these random values and > make them stable for the next stage, to be used to provide the needed > idempotency for sinks. > In such cases, I think the author should error out on the runner that don't provide that guarantee. That is what ExactlyOnceSink in KafkaIO does [1]. [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kafka/KafkaIO.java#L1049 > Kenn > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:05 PM Raghu Angadi <rang...@google.com> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:21 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:46 AM Raghu Angadi <rang...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Kenn. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The fact that its usage has grown probably indicates that we have a >>>>> large number of transforms that can easily cause data loss / duplication. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this specific to Reshuffle or it is true for any GroupByKey? I see >>>> Reshuffle as just a wrapper around GBK. >>>> >>> The issue is when it's used in such a way that data corruption can occur >>> when the underlying GBK output is not stable. >>> >> >> Could you describe this breakage bit more in detail or give a example? >> Apologies in advance, I know this came up in multiple contexts in the past, >> but I haven't grokked the issue well. It is the window rewrite that >> Reshuffle does that causes misuse of GBK? >> >> Thanks. >> >