I think it makes sense to cut the release and get the ball rolling, and iff the ParquetIO/S3 issue turns out to be simple, we cherry-pick, otherwise we add a note.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding RabbitMqIO, Eugene provided new feedback last night that I > would like to implement. However, it's not a release blocker, so I will > move forward with 2.5.0 release without RabbitMqIO (I will include in > 2.6.0). > > Regarding ParquetIO, I tested HDFS successfully as well (I had an issue > on my namenode). S3 is important, but I think we can just add a note in > the RELEASE NOTE and move forward with 2.5.0. Thoughts ? > > So, please, let me know if I can start the release process today (I > would like to move forward asap). > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > >
