Yea - the branch should be cut before trying to finish the burndown. Kenn
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:09 AM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it makes sense to cut the release and get the ball rolling, and > iff the ParquetIO/S3 issue turns out to be simple, we cherry-pick, > otherwise we add a note. > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Regarding RabbitMqIO, Eugene provided new feedback last night that I >> would like to implement. However, it's not a release blocker, so I will >> move forward with 2.5.0 release without RabbitMqIO (I will include in >> 2.6.0). >> >> Regarding ParquetIO, I tested HDFS successfully as well (I had an issue >> on my namenode). S3 is important, but I think we can just add a note in >> the RELEASE NOTE and move forward with 2.5.0. Thoughts ? >> >> So, please, let me know if I can start the release process today (I >> would like to move forward asap). >> >> Thanks, >> Regards >> JB >> >>
