Agree, I gonna start the release process tonight (my time). Regards JB
Le 31 mai 2018 à 14:29, à 14:29, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> a écrit: >Yea - the branch should be cut before trying to finish the burndown. > >Kenn > >On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:09 AM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> I think it makes sense to cut the release and get the ball rolling, >and >> iff the ParquetIO/S3 issue turns out to be simple, we cherry-pick, >> otherwise we add a note. >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré ><[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Regarding RabbitMqIO, Eugene provided new feedback last night that I >>> would like to implement. However, it's not a release blocker, so I >will >>> move forward with 2.5.0 release without RabbitMqIO (I will include >in >>> 2.6.0). >>> >>> Regarding ParquetIO, I tested HDFS successfully as well (I had an >issue >>> on my namenode). S3 is important, but I think we can just add a note >in >>> the RELEASE NOTE and move forward with 2.5.0. Thoughts ? >>> >>> So, please, let me know if I can start the release process today (I >>> would like to move forward asap). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>>
