+1 On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:27 PM Dan Halperin <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 -- this is encoding what I previously thought the process was and what, > in practice, I think was often the behavior of committers anyway. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Yifan Zou <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:10 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:06 PM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Cham >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Jason Kuster <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:28 AM Charles Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:20 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM Thomas Groh <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As we seem to largely have consensus in "Reducing Committer Load >>>>>>>>>>> for Code Reviews"[1], this is a vote to change the Beam policy on >>>>>>>>>>> Code >>>>>>>>>>> Reviews to require that >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (1) At least one committer is involved with the code review, as >>>>>>>>>>> either a reviewer or as the author >>>>>>>>>>> (2) A contributor has approved the change >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> prior to merging any change. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This changes our policy from its current requirement that at >>>>>>>>>>> least one committer *who is not the author* has approved the change >>>>>>>>>>> prior >>>>>>>>>>> to merging. We believe that changing this process will improve code >>>>>>>>>>> review >>>>>>>>>>> throughput, reduce committer load, and engage more of the community >>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>> code review process. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the above proposal to change the Beam code >>>>>>>>>>> review/merge policy >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Leave the Code Review policy unchanged >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c1fde3884fbefacc252b6d4b434f9a9c2cf024f381654aa3e47df18@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ------- >>>>> Jason Kuster >>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow >>>>> >>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback >>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback> >>>>> >>>> >
