+1 - I hope this doesn't reduce the urgency to fix the root cause: not having enough committers.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:18 PM Henning Rohde <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:27 PM Dan Halperin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 -- this is encoding what I previously thought the process was and >> what, in practice, I think was often the behavior of committers anyway. >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Yifan Zou <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:10 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:06 PM Chamikara Jayalath < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cham >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Jason Kuster <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:28 AM Charles Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:20 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM Thomas Groh <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As we seem to largely have consensus in "Reducing Committer >>>>>>>>>>>> Load for Code Reviews"[1], this is a vote to change the Beam >>>>>>>>>>>> policy on Code >>>>>>>>>>>> Reviews to require that >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (1) At least one committer is involved with the code review, as >>>>>>>>>>>> either a reviewer or as the author >>>>>>>>>>>> (2) A contributor has approved the change >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> prior to merging any change. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This changes our policy from its current requirement that at >>>>>>>>>>>> least one committer *who is not the author* has approved the >>>>>>>>>>>> change prior >>>>>>>>>>>> to merging. We believe that changing this process will improve >>>>>>>>>>>> code review >>>>>>>>>>>> throughput, reduce committer load, and engage more of the >>>>>>>>>>>> community in the >>>>>>>>>>>> code review process. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the above proposal to change the Beam code >>>>>>>>>>>> review/merge policy >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Leave the Code Review policy unchanged >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c1fde3884fbefacc252b6d4b434f9a9c2cf024f381654aa3e47df18@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ------- >>>>>> Jason Kuster >>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow >>>>>> >>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback >>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback> >>>>>> >>>>> >>
